Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Rationale of Intentional Christian Formation



Rationale of Intentional Christian Formation
By Kurai Chitima

Without Christian formation the church’s task remains unfinished. Church is meant to be manufacturing this product. In John 17:4, Jesus told the Father that he had finished the work he had been sent to do. Jesus finished the Christian formation of his selected followers (John 17:4) then the work of redemption (John 19:30). Jesus finished his task (John 17:4) by raising followers with whom he would leave the charge of looking after his sheep, and of Christian formation to spread his gospel and influence to the whole world.

Christian formation is the most effective way to build the church and transform individuals and communities. It involves equipping the disciple to train others to a “third generation” (2 Tim. 2:2; Matt. 28:20). This preparation results in the multiplication of disciples and ministers as those who are taught to teach others. Initially, it may be strenuous and slow, but the process eventually bears much fruit as illustrated in Figure 2.1.

 Figure 2.1 compares a situation where one group is adding one thousand people to their number each year and the other who begins with two, multiplying themselves by each facilitating the Christian formation of two others each year. Christian formation may begin slowly, but as the process and reproduction continues, a movement of changed lives will explode (Acts 5:28; 17:6-8). If this strategy is done well, the movement brings transformation to whole communities, cities, nations, and, ultimately, to whole continents, and eventually the world. Then the end will come (Matt. 24:14). “Unless disciples are adequately built, there will not be enough competent leadership to carry on the work of the church” (Wilson 156).



            Many churches have no leaders, neither do they produce leaders because they are looking for perfect people. They fail to be facilitators of Christian formation who see potential. Jesus’ men were ordinary, with many faults and failings. Hence, they needed to be spiritually developed. The best practice is to pass on sustained, sound doctrine, and spiritual vibrancy from one generation to another, and thereby avoid spiritual, moral, and doctrinal degeneration. Otherwise, non-biblical or weak teaching/preaching and practices find root in the church to the detriment of future sound teaching. Key biblical teachings such as on grace and forgiveness end up lost. The great truths inherited from church history become lighter and lighter with each generation if effort is not made to preserve them (Jude 3 NIV).

Christian formation is the cure to a growing challenge of nominalism, or lack of commitment and active ministry participation among professing Christians. The problem of people staying in the church after being won to Christ could also be remedied by effective Christian formation. Without effective Christian formation, believers will not grow to maturity and nominalism will increase; leaders and ministers will be few, churches will not grow, and their influence in society will be limited. The stakes are high because Christian formation is the means by which the potential of believers, and therefore that of the church, is realized. Africa will fail to prepare for its increasing central role in the future of missions as a major Christian territory (Jenkins 89-90).

The Church, especially the local church, is God’s strategy for Christian growth, maturity (Eph. 4:11-16), and reaching all people. The church is the center for Christian nurture and inspiration in daily life and vocation. Barna explains, “True Revolutionaries agree that being isolated from other believers—i.e., the Church [note the capital C]—is unbiblical. However, while they may not be integrated into a formal church organization, they are not isolated from the Church” (116). I believe that while due to local church deficiencies believers resort to alternative communities for nurturing, the future is best served by strengthening the local church and linking it up with the alternative communities. I concur with Bill Hybels’ affirmation of the traditional role of the local church. He says, “I believe that the local church is the hope of the world. I believe to the core of my being that local church leaders have the potential to be the most influential force on planet earth” (12). He also wrote, “The local church is the hope of the world and its future rests primarily in the hands of its leaders.” (27)

Both content and a community of people who know and accept each other are necessary for learning and relating (1 Cor. 7:15; Col. 3:15; Gal. 5:13; 1 Thess. 4:7; 2 Tim. 1:9) (Stevens 86, 60). The corporate nature of Christian formation can also be found in Ephesians 4:11-13, Romans 12:6-8, 1 Corinthians 12:1-10, and 1 Peter 4:11. The fellowship transcends sharing information to sharing lives (1 Thess. 2:8). The community provides encouragement (Heb. 10:25) and a frame of reference for development since individuals mature with respect to other members of the body (1 Cor. 12). The individual and the corporate dimensions of the Christian life must be viewed in balance. The two are important and work together:

[S]ince to be a person is to be in relationship with others, involvement in a small group of fellow Christians who are committed to us and to our journey together is indispensable to our spiritual and emotional growth. (Seamands 4)

Individuality is important for the wholeness of the corporate much as the corporate enriches the individual.

Christian formation for church work is viewed more seriously in congregational life than that for other work.

Formation for leadership is taken seriously for those who are seeking ordination. Unfortunately, formation other than for ordination is not taken as seriously in congregational life. I believe that God calls us into relationship, to be partners in creation throughout our lives and through all our actions and words within the church and in the world. This call is given to all people of God, not simply to a chosen few. (Johnson 2)

Johnson’s observation is that lay leaders in the church often operate under unclear expectations and accountability lines (17). Every call of God, whether for clergy or lay person, should be recognized and supported as part of “equipping the saints” of Christ’s church (3). A Christian community brings a faith perspective to the wisdom in education, business, science, and humanities (5, 6). Johnson views congregational life as a locus for learning, and supervision for personal enhancement of God’s call. Obed notes, “[T]he fellowship of brethren is also the platform for a believer’s meaningful spiritual growth toward maturity in Christ Jesus. No one grows spiritually in total isolation” (33).
I believe that the association with a non-church environment is also vital for an effective Christian formation process. A relationship with the world exposes the disciple to experiences and circumstances useful for spiritual shaping as well as the reality of the harvest field’s needs, and provides the opportunity for the disciple to practice what he/she is learning. Howard and William Hendricks argue that while ideally you want a mentor who is a believer, “it’s a mistake to think that only believers can make a substantial, positive impact on your life” (76). Howard benefitted from non Christians and believes they can instruct about positive traits and professional growth.

Churches should not feel threatened by the increase in the number of resourceful para church organizations that meet market place ministry development needs that the church may not be fulfilling. Specialized Christian formation for secular vocations requires a wider platform. The churches can start market place ministries that cooperate with the secular outreaches. Adsit argues that a disciple needs contact with more than one other believer (15). One person alone is more likely to pass on his or her weaknesses. Ideally, however, church members should have facilitators who personally walk with them to nurture their growth in Christ. In addition, each should be a member of a small group of believers for teaching, fellowship, and caring.


REFERENCES

Adsit, Christopher B. Personal Discipleship: A Step by Step Guide for Leading a Christian from New Birth to Maturity. San Bernardino, CA: Here’s Life, 1988.
Barna, George. Leaders on Leadership: Wisdom, Advise, and Encouragement on the Art of Leading God’s People. Ventura, CA: Regal Books, 1997.
Hendricks, Howard, and William Hendricks. As Iron Sharpens Iron: Building Character in a Mentoring Relationship. Chicago, IL: Moody, 1995.
Hybels, Bill. Courageous Leadership. Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan, 2002.
Jenkins, Philip. The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity. New York: Oxford UP, 2002.
Johnson, Abigail. Shaping Spiritual Leaders: Supervision and Formation in Congregations. Herndon, VA: The Alban Institute, 2007.
Seamands, Stephen. Ministry in the Image of God: The Trinitarian Shape of Christian Service. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2005.
Stevens, Paul R. The Other Six Days: Vocation, Work, and Ministry in Biblical Perspective. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.
Wilson, Carl. With Christ in the School of Disciple Building. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1976.





No comments:

Post a Comment